The Leadership Discussion Blog for The Core Fellowship

10.20.2006

Covenant & Accountability Structure

I am linking you to three documents here:

(By the way, if you have not read Josh's entry, "Learning Jesus" yet, read that first.)

1 - Team Member Covenant - much less detailed and demanding than previously, but still quite challenging.

2 - Overseer Covenant - what was previously called the Team Member Covenant. Recent criticisms have not caused me to pitch this document, but rather to apply it to a higher level of leadership. Although scoring yourself would be optional, setting goals and establishing accountability would be required.

3 - Accountability Structure - This is the latest version of what I was previously calling the "Advancement & Reporting Structure." This explains my most recent thinking about how to set up The Core as an organization. Please bear with me if this looks like Church Politics to you. I hear ya loud and clear. But I have no doubt that we need to be well organized if we are going to be efficient communicators, and if each person is going to be clear as to their role and how they fit into the grand scheme. Without this kind of advanced planning, chaos, disillusionment and failure is always lurking around the corner. A well thought-out structure is rarely to blame for bad church politics... it's usually the result of valuing control and power over servanthood. Be sure to read page 2 for the descriptions.

1 Comments:

Blogger beloved268 said...

As I mentioned on the phone, I believe "Accountability structure" is not only a friendlier term, but also a more accurate one. I like how things are broken down. Still not sure how I feel about having 8-10 overseers. I'd like to seek the wisdom of others who have adopted an elder-based church to see how this works. I can't say that I feel that we should necessarily limit eldership to the 4 directors and lead pastor, but I definitely don't think every coordinator should be required to be an overseer. As leaders, we will all exercise some degree of pastoring and overseeing others. I guess we'll just have to dialogue on who all feels the calling to be held accountable for the flock in our various capacities.

Re: the explanation portion, under the Director section, you start getting into stuff that will need to be covered in bylaws (i.e. the decision-making process). I would say that, at least for a while, we should not implement voting, but should require consensus. This could be a bit laborsome, but voting could prove destructive to the harmony of the group at this point in the game. At least it would put a very bitter taste in my mouth.

2:22 PM

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home