Friday, March 16, 2007

No More Sissy Jesus

It looks like Christianity is playing a new game of “He Said, She Said.”

She said, “Jesus is our bridegroom, and we’re his bride. And that’s great, because he’s kind and gentle and forgiving, and he wants us to worship him with pretty music and poetry and floral arrangements all over the place.”

He said, “Jesus is a masculine dude… he was a carpenter and rebel. He was always stickin’ it to the man. You know, calling the Phrisees vipers and battling Satan and driving the crooks out of the Temple with a whip he made himself. He wants us to worship him with rock music and shouting and gut-level honesty and risk-taking and bending metal.”

Literally.

Good Morning America this morning featured an organization called “GodMen”, that wants to give the Christian faith a shot in the arm… the big, muscle-bound arm. And it turns out that muscles are a very important aspect to this brand of faith, because some participants actually get the opportunity to bend frying pans.

GodMen’s founder Brad Stine says the point is to “toughen up Christian men.”

Here’s the problem, as they see it: apparently only 4 out of 10 church-goers is male (and it’s not unlikely that 1 of those 4 was dragged there by his wife.) Some men have looked around at the total package experience of Church, and found the reason was obvious. Everything seems tailored to appeal to women: the music, the décor… Even the target virtues (grace, love, peace, etc) have a feminine slant.

They’ve got a point. But if you think you know where I’m going with this… hold on.

Stine says, “There’s nuances to Christianity; there’s elements that we haven’t been taught as men because we’re different from women. So when we walk into a church, we don’t see metal, we see ferns. We’re not used to that. We want something that shows the masculine side as well. We’re not trying to take over. We love the feminine side, but we think there should be a balance so that both sides are represented.”

So I’ve gotta ask… Is the Church a democratic republic? Is the goal to evenly represent the characteristics and personalities of its members?

We have no excuse in this day and age to ignore the role that culture plays in our spiritual development. Because we are “in the world” we can never get away from that influence. And if you’re a man, you may indeed be feeling somewhat left out of the equation… much like a Spanish speaker in an English-language service. “Is anyone here trying to relate to me?

But at the end of the day, these “GodMen” need to recognize that God is not a man. Nor is he a woman. God transcends masculinity and femininity... and it’s a good thing, too. Because our gender, our language, our nationality, our personality... these things are just launchpads from which we embark our spiritual journey. And although we will never fully escape them during our lifetimes, we are foolish to strap ourselves down.

Kudos to these guys for keeping it real, and for driving the message home in a fresh and relevant way. But when they go back to their home congregations, let’s hope they take with them far more than a penchant for gender equity. Let’s hope we can all learn to die to ourselves, and be found alive in Christ.

Labels: , ,

8 Comments:

At 5:25 PM , Blogger Jetpacks said...

Awesome pic of Rifleman Jesus. Where'd you get that?

If the goal of the GodMen is simply to get more men into church, what harm in pointing out some of the historical inaccuracies we've been fed? Most get their image of Jesus from either the Jesus of Nazareth film, where he was a frail wimp with a British accent, or that lame picture of Jesus staring up into space. He was, after all, a carpenter BEFORE they had power tools.

And yes, God is not a man, but Jesus was. People have been pointing to the manliness of Jesus since the early 1900s (See Dr. Frank Crane)and yet the wimp myth persists.

Church a democratic republic? No. But how much easier for a "man's man" to "be found alive in Christ" if he can realize that Christ was not the girlish wuss he's been made out to be.

 
At 7:18 PM , Blogger The Coreman said...

I think you're mostly right.

But to be fair, we have to step back and make sure that we're not molding Jesus into OUR image. Yes, it was manly that he was a carpenter. No, it was not manly when he said "turn the other cheek." Yes, it was manly when he drove out the moneychangers. No, it was not manly when he said, "Oh Jerusalem, how I long to gather you as a hen gathers her chicks." (Although some manly men consider themselves adept at chick-gathering.) Yes, it was manly when he chose not to speak to his accusers. No, it was not manly when he chose not to fight his accusers.

If were're looking for a Jesus that's going to make us feel strong and cool and in-charge, we won't find the real one. Much of the Spirit-life is counter-natural, no matter which gender you are.

It's true that we have to start rejecting some of the cultural barriers we place between others and Christ. But no matter how much "easier" we manage to make the transition, it will never be easy. It's not supposed to be.

 
At 10:06 PM , Anonymous ariel said...

My first thought after reading the Blog:

“Man was created in the image of God”

Woman was created from Adam’s Rib. Adam said about Eve:
“This is bone of MY bone and flesh of MY flesh”

So the immortal first Man was made in God’s image. The immortal first woman was made in Man’s image (bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh)

Maybe God is both male and female in the original immortal state of Adam & Eve… before they fell from grace.

But with the Messiah - Jesus - we are living in grace once again.

Therefore, Men & Women who have the Holy Spirit of Christ in their hearts = God.

God is Man and Man is Woman and Woman is Man and Man is God.

So the "church" should be both masculine and feminine to reflect the true nature of God & Christ.

 
At 9:48 AM , Blogger Beloved said...

Ariel, the first part of what you say is true.

Coreman, you made a great point, and then refuted yourself. Balance is good. Christ is both masculine and feminine. The church is heavy on the feminine side. Needs a greater dose of masculinity. No takeover going on here.

 
At 11:53 PM , Anonymous Caleb said...

I don't think pure appeasement will help with this issue. Maybe going after a better view of Jesus, rather than trying to balance out the feminine and Masculine, would make church more relevant to everyone. That’s why the free market is so great. I see churches in my town that are always doing the same old mediocre christianity (which includes Mr. Roger's Jesus) withering away. Those churches with leaders who are bold and loving and biblical and contemporary and relevant are seeing their numbers grow. I think both men and women need to experience every aspect of God, whether it’s his tender side or his strong side. I do understand what these GodMen are talking about. I have never felt like any part of the Gospels (or the whole Bible) is trying to suck up to its readers. But our whole culture, including the Christian culture, is all about being "nice". Jesus was described as someone who spoke with authority, unlike the other religious leaders of his time. So I guess this isn't a brand new dilemma. Just my opinion, but the book "Wild at Heart" adds a great deal to this particular issue.

 
At 10:33 AM , Blogger The Coreman said...

You're right.

I like to say that Jesus came to comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable.

If a man is comfortable in his masculinity, Jesus doesn't necessarily want to negate that, but he will probably want him to surrender his comfortable manliness in order to accept teachings like "turn the other cheek."

If a woman is comfortable in her femininity, Jesus may challenge her to be more bold... perhaps to stop being so afraid to offend people and start speaking the hard truth of the gospel.

Of course, these are just stereotypes, but I think they illustrate a good point.

 
At 1:39 AM , Blogger shakedust said...

It's a little late to jump in here, but I always felt that the church (by which I mean the general environment surrounding conservative Evangelical churches) encouraged femininity over masculinity. If I picture what I used to think was a perfect Christian, there are a lot more traditionally feminine traits than male traits.

My personal opinion is that most feminizing of Jesus' character is due to a subconscious assumption that femininity is more holy. Your experience may differ.

 
At 4:02 PM , Blogger Beloved said...

In some of my Communication studies in college (OK, most of them) "feminine" communication styles were generally posited as more "ethical" in terms of interpersonal communication. But the interesting thing was that there was a bit of a double standard. The "masculine" side was characterized as far as one could go on the masc-fem continuum (aggressive, dominant, competitive, saving one's own face), whereas the "feminine" side was usually represented as the happy medium (assertive, empathic, relational, saving the other's face). In reality, however, the two ends of the spectrum are "aggressive" and "passive", with "assertive" being the middle-ground, the goal of effective, ethical communication. It was the compromise between masculinity and femininity. Interesting.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home