Wednesday, February 06, 2008

West Bank Choppers (and Gougers)

Things are getting a little crazy... not a good environment for avid blogging.

I'm very busy at my new job. Things are great... in fact, a little too great. I get a bonus for each hour I spend doing graphic design work for our clients. And I have so much design work to do in the next week and a half that I'm not sure if I can finish it all. It's like the nets that were so full of fish they were breaking.

And our Sunday Worship Gatherings are packing out. A similar problem, I suppose. But the whole idea of what we're doing on Sundays at the Front Porch is to have an intimate, relational, comfortable environment for people to open up and feel like they really matter to each other. But when you start running out of chairs and start feeling tempted to set them up in rows instead of around tables, the very success of the effort can be its own demise.

Last Sunday I talked about the Sermon on the Mount. I made a couple of points that I don't hear bandied about much:

1) I don't believe Jesus was "preaching" to the crowd. I believe he was retreating from the crowd, and instructing his disciples. By "disciples" I mean not just the 12, but those who had made some sort of sacrifice to follow him. I think if you read the accounts carefully in both Matthew and Luke, you will see why I believe this. But I think it's important, because it explains why the Sermon on the Mount looks more like a list of instructions, and less like an inspirational oratory.

2) I think I have an actual explanation for one of the weirdest things Jesus ever said, in Matthew 5:29, 30... "If your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off... if your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out... Every commentary I could find says basically that Jesus was emphasizing to us the true danger of sin, and the seriousness of avoiding that which can lead us into it. But that just sounds lame to me, like the answer of someone who doesn't really know, but has to act like they do anyway. My point is, Jesus just got finished talking about committing adultery (or murder) in the heart. He is teaching us that all sin really occurs in the heart, and what our hands or our eyes do is just an outworking of sin, or a manifestation of sin. When he talks about your right hand causing you to sin, he's referring to what he said earlier about murder, and how the sin is actually occurring in your heart, not in your hand. Same thing with the right eye, and adultery.

Jesus is mocking those (the Pharisees, primarily) who try to blame their sin on their appendages, suggesting that if they just removed those body parts, they could be free of sin. Thus he re-inforces his antidote to legalism by reminding us that sin occurs in the heart, at the deepest part of ourselves, where only God can truly judge us.

Later on that evening, after the Super Bowl, my friend Phillip (who heard my shpiel earlier that morning) asked me about my assertions on that passage. He said he believed that Jesus was also saying that we should try to avoid the things that may cause us to sin.

Although I do believe it is wise to understand what things bring temptation into your life, and to structure your life in such a way to minimize temptation (I do this myself) I cannot believe that this was even one of Jesus' points in Matthew 5:29 and 30. And this is why: Jesus takes great pains to contradict the legalism of the Pharisees, and one of the greatest Pharisaical blunders is to mandate the creation of giant hedges around the law. Meta-laws, if you will, that purport to erect an insurmountable shield to God's actual laws. This is taking the wisdom of avoiding temptation to a ridiculous extreme, that creates a tremendous burden on people who are simply trying to live their lives.

Despite this burden, the common people actually admired the Pharisees. They were it. Nobody needed to be told to try and avoid temptation... the true sin in that culture was to believe that there were humanly possible ways to be sinless and perfect, and the result was a truly insidious type of legalism, that deserved all the ridicule Jesus could muster.

I can actually image the raucous laughter that might have ensued as Jesus mimed out the cutting off of a hand, or the gouging out of an eye, as if such self-mutilation (also referenced by Paul, although of a much more... ahem... personal... variety) could actually bring about righteousness. Jesus took their error to its natural, logical conclusion, and exposed their absurdities. And he actually did it many times throughout his ministry.

Jesus would like to thank you for reading... you've been a wonderful audience. Don't forget to tip your waitresses.

Labels: , , ,

10 Comments:

At 1:05 PM , Blogger Phillip Scoggins said...

See? You don't need time to think up BLOG ideas, just use your messages.

I'll be back later to say something forizzle. They make me work around here so I have to go for the time being.

 
At 6:26 PM , Blogger Rafe said...

You were using a phrase last Sunday that I liked and I can't remember it exactly...especially this one word. You were saying something along the lines of, "Jesus came to the earth to make the ______ comfortable and the comfortable ________." What's the missing word....I believe it started with a 'D'?

 
At 9:59 PM , Blogger The Coreman said...

"Jesus came to comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable." I only wish I knew who to credit for that little truism.

 
At 12:16 AM , Blogger Rafe said...

Thanks Ryan. I was really wanting the complete quote. See ya soon!

 
At 10:38 AM , Blogger beloved268 said...

Hey bro,

Your interpretation is tempting, and your conclusions are insightful... but you'd be hard-pressed to argue against the "avoid temptation" or "take sin seriously" interpretation based on the extent to which Jesus takes the argument. He doesn't merely say, "If... then..." but explains why. "It is better for you to lose one part of our body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell." If he was simply being sarcastic, in essence, mocking the Pharisees for their legalism, he would not have provided this explanation.

Furthermore, Jesus' problem with the Pharisees wasn't with their moral strictness, but with their hearts, which didn't match their outward actions. You are right that Jesus wanted to shoot down any attempts to gain righteous standing before God via works, which is what they were doing. But it's important to distinguish self-righteous "humility" from the kind of rigorous discernment and self-denial that is birthed out of a heart of (a) gratitude for God's grace, and (b) love for others manifested in an earnest desire to be both a blessing and example to them (that they might also receive such a blessing).

Flipping this whole argument around, the Pharisees cannot be (and were not) judged by their outward attempts to flee temptation. Jesus judged their hearts (because he knew them). Therefore, we cannot draw any conclusions regarding the viability of stringent self-discipline in fleeing temptation (as we are explicitly commanded elsewhere in Scripture to do).

 
At 12:03 PM , Blogger The Coreman said...

Keep in mind... I do believe that Jesus wants us to avoid temptation and take sin seriously. I just don't believe it's possible that that is the point he's making in this passage. I also believe that he is continuing to be tongue-in-cheek when he explains himself, about the whole body being thrown into hell.

I know it rubs people the wrong way to "write off" a quote from Jesus by saying he was being sarcastic, but the only other options we have are a) that he really does want us to cut off our hands and gouge out our eyes, or b) that he is being wildly hyperbolic, and we have to "tone down" Jesus' words in order to interpret them, much like a press secretary putting out a fire by explaining "what the President really meant." None of the options we have are really all that pleasant.

I agree with you about the Pharisees. Their problem was in their hearts, but they didn't understand that. They thought it was an outward thing that could be stretched and beaten into submission.

Remember, the Pharisees were not just practicing self-discipline in order to please God, they were imposing an artificial set of meta-laws on the entire population, one that put everybody in a type of legalistic bondage, and made sure that they themselves held their positions as the "most righteous ones."

 
At 12:28 PM , Anonymous Ari said...

Coreman, responding to your 9:59 comment, and to give credit where credit is due, here it is:

"if you love your life, you will lose it. if you lose your life for the Kingdom of God you will then gain or reclaim your life.."

and the quote by Christ which reads (paraphrased): "if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off; if your eye causes you to sin, gouge it..."

I always took that quote by Jesus literally. Have I really been wrong all these years?

I believe it is a literal comment. Therefore, if it were not for the redemptive power of Christ, who redeemed our (sometimes) evil hearts --- I think that we would all be dismembered."

Thank God Christ died for any and all evil, perverse and/or corrupt thoughts, deeds and actions so that we can all remain whole in body and mind.

 
At 1:12 PM , Blogger The Coreman said...

A lot of people say they read a lot of scripture literally, but there's always some level of personal interpretation going on.

Ari, if you really take that verse as "literal" then you would recognize that there's not an exception clause, as in, "cut off your hand unless you're covered by my blood." Especially when you consider that Jesus' redemptive work had not yet occurred. If he meant it literally, then he would have been very disappointed when nobody responded to his command by immediately dismembering themselves.

Besides... can it really be the command of God for someone to commit an extreme act of violence against their own body, for spiritual reasons? Remember in I Kings how the Baal worshippers cut themselves trying to get their god to respond and send down the fire, while Elijah simply prayed and God responded.

We do not serve a God like Baal.

 
At 10:22 AM , Anonymous ari said...

Exception clause or not, I truly believe that the statement is literal. Not all statements in Scripture are literal by any means – especially the symbolism in the Book of Daniel and Revelations for example. But, in my opinion, this statement by Jesus is a literal statement.

I believe Christ spoke in a very literal way in this example even though His redemptive work had not yet been done.

Before Christ’s Sermon on the Mount, people were really and truly subject to the gougers and choppers and corrupt execution of antiquated leadership.

After his redemptive work people were still subject to the gougers and choppers and inhuman treatment until the Holy Spirit of Christ began to slowly change the brutal nature of mankind.

Therefore, before Christ was crucified and rose from the dead, we were all subject to the Choppers and Gougers on a regular basis; and far more subject to our own personal sin.

After Christ rose from the dead and the Holy Spirit descended on those who accepted Him, we were (past, present, and future) the only ones who would eventually, (eventually is the operative word here) not be victims of our own personal sin and the collective sin of humanity.

If a person is not covered by the blood of Christ, and they sin in some fashion or another, (including a sin caused by a body part) then eternal retribution will catch up with that unsaved person and they will be subject to pay the price.

Of course, we can never know exactly how that 'price' will manifest because we are not God.

And there is another factor in play here:
For better and for worse, sometimes God is more patient with un-Belief because “…they know not what they do…”. We Christ followers do not have that excess so we have to be extremely careful not to commit willful sin and other forms of sin.

We all know, however, that regardless of how ‘careful’ we are not to sin we sometimes do anyway.
At those times we Believers know that we can get down on our knees, ask and receive forgiveness so we will not pay the price that we deserve because Christ already paid for all the sins that would, otherwise, leave us in very bad shape or worse shape than we are in now.

 
At 10:40 AM , Anonymous ari said...

Coreman:
I just read your statement again and I realize that you and I are coming from different points of reference.

I never thought that Christ meant to go out and cut off your own hand, for example. That would be crazy.

The following has always been my interpretation because I read the deeper spiritual meaning and that is all I think about:

It is better to lose a body part than for that body part to cause you to be cast into Hell at the end of your life, or possibly before the end of your life.

Therefore, we better repent and change now if a body part is causing us to sin, assuming we know about it. If we do not repent and change of sinful habits, we are subject to pay the price sooner or later because of Eternal retribution.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home