Zadok and Zebulun
Note: This is a short story I wrote, which was published at jesusmanifesto.com in November 2007. I did so because that website's readership is largely unknown to me. For a long time I was hesitant to share this with those I am close to, but I feel like the time is right. Enjoy the story, and share your thoughts in the comments. (You should definitely have thoughts...)
Long ago there lived two Israelite men in the great city of Babylon. They were twins, named Zadok and Zebulun, although the Babylonians gave them strange, dishonorable names that we will not mention here.Zadok and Zebulun were good men, righteous and blameless. And although they were not priests or rabbis, they wielded an impressive grasp of scriptural interpretation and application. Their natural hero was Daniel, who died hundreds of years ago, but left behind a legacy and respectability for the descendants of Abraham that continued firmly to the present day. In all their studies, and whenever they lied down and got up, whenever they worked or ate or walked from place to place, they struggled to follow the ways of God, in the footsteps of the prophet Daniel.
Occasionally they would hear news from Israel, where they longed to return within their lifetimes. It grieved them to learn that the priests and teachers of the law, and virtually the entire class of Pharisees, had become obsessed with legalities and judgment. Their very own tribe, it appeared, had lost their sense of direction… their sense of God’s heart, who desires mercy, not sacrifice.
And although mercy and humility were their highest aim, they knew that sacrifices must continue until their Messiah arrived.
They were also aware of the state of bondage in Israel–that Rome had overrun their homeland, and that many Israelites were desperate for a Messiah to come at last to free them. And though their hearts beat as one with the people of their own blood, Zadok and Zebulun knew deeply that a Messiah was to come, not to rescue their people from invasion, but from their sins. It was the prophet Isaiah who said of the coming Messiah, “He was pierced for our transgressions, and crushed for our iniquities.” They could only pray that when the Messiah did come, the people would see him for who he was.
If only they had known that at that very time the Messiah was, indeed, present in Israel. He was born about the time Zadok and Zebulun were getting married… 18, 19 years old. And now the Messiah was 33 years old, at the height of his earthly ministry.
It was during this year, nearing the feast of Passover, that Zadok became deathly ill. He was in such great pain that the 22nd Psalm became his mantra–a Psalm of deep suffering, but earth-shattering hope. As the family gathered around in an attempt to include him in their Passover meal, he quoted it again, gathering strength at the climax, “All the ends of the earth will remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the nations will bow down before him, for dominion belongs to the Lord and he rules over the nations.” And finally, with his last breath he whispered hoarsely, “Next year in Jerusalem.” And each member of his family echoed, “Next year in Jerusalem.” And Zadok went to the bosom of Abraham.
After a few days spent in utter grief, Zebulun became determined to fulfill his brother’s wish, to be in Jerusalem, on his behalf. He gathered his servants, camels, and supplies and set out for the City of David.
As he embarked from Babylon, unbelievable things were happening in Jerusalem. Those who once followed the Messiah had now turned on him, and demanded that he be crucified at the hand of Pontius Pilate. The greatest man ever to walk the earth became a humiliating spectacle, and died harshly and grimly in the full sight of passers-by. He was wrapped up and buried in a rich man’s tomb. But on the third day he conquered that grave, and rose to proclaim God’s victory and resurrection to all mankind. The Messiah, Jesus, had ushered in a new covenant where all who claim him would be saved.
Zebulun was on his way there–on his way, unkowingly, to take part in this celebration of new life. But then tragedy struck, as a band of thieves ambushed his traveling party, made off with his belongings, and killed him and all his servants in cold blood.
Zadok died under the old covenant, and went to be with his God. Zebulun died under the new covenant, not knowing or accepting the name of Jesus, and went instead to eternal punishment.
At least that's what Sunday School has taught me. Or am I missing something?
+
Labels: creative writing, doctrine



6 Comments:
A covenant is an agreement not unlike a contract, right? When a contract is replaced by another contract there is specific language naming that first contract and claiming it null and void henceforth. Where is the language in God's Word that specifically denies any current plausibility of the standing of the old covenant? My Sunday school taught me that one can live by either covenant, however who would want to live by the old one? It's a lot of work. I'd much rather see my sacrifices bless someone else while furthering the Kingdom of God than to see them go up in smoke simply to cover my sins.
Using this scenario, accepting that there was no end to the old covenant, your story has a much more pleasant alternate ending.
Some good thinking there... but I don't believe the similarities between a covenant and a contract are enough to draw this kind of conclusion.
Nevertheless, I can't shake the assertion from every self-respecting theologian that "people are essentially saved the same way now as they were before Christ... by faith in Jesus, as either a known person, or a future promise." If people could be saved during the Old Covenant by faith in a promised person yet unknown, is it possible that they could also be saved today by having faith in a promised person so far unknown to them?The fact is, I just don't know.
love it!
"is it possible that they could also be saved today by having faith in a promised person so far unknown to them?"
Sounds like someone has been reading some C.S. Lewis. :)
That may be possible. But if it is, what are the implications for the "heathen" people groups that Christian missionaries have yet to reach? Is it possible that some members of those groups "have faith in a promised person so far unknown to them?"
And yes, I love C.S. Lewis. Although it amazes me how widely venerated he can be in traditional orthodox circles, despite the claims he makes about the possibility of salvation apart from explicit knowledge of Christ.
Sorry Boyd, it just occurred to me that your first sentence was actually quoting me, instead of speaking for yourself.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home